<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Spreadsheet vs EditGrid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.compactbyte.com/2006/06/07/google-spreadsheet-vs-editgrid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.compactbyte.com/2006/06/07/google-spreadsheet-vs-editgrid/</link>
	<description>Sola Gratia, Sola Fide, Sola Christus, Sola Scriptura, Soli Deo Gloria</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:56:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lee</title>
		<link>http://blog.compactbyte.com/2006/06/07/google-spreadsheet-vs-editgrid/comment-page-1/#comment-76620</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 07:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compactbyte.com/?p=267#comment-76620</guid>
		<description>Hello, Thanks so much for your product comparison!

For your information. EditGrid support full scale sreadsheet with 65536 rows and 256 columns. Try to use your keyboard to navigate to those cell. We design our scrolling to let use focus on the area with data. So, you may not be able to use the scroll to go to area with no data initially.

By your comparison, we discovered a silly mistake when we are packing the javascript. We&#039;ve packed a new one and now it size is just ~120K, so, it should loads about 5 times faster now. Sorry for your inconvenience.

&lt;b&gt;Joe: sorry, it should have been 2&lt;sup&gt;16&lt;/sup&gt; rows, and not 216 rows, fixed now&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Thanks so much for your product comparison!</p>
<p>For your information. EditGrid support full scale sreadsheet with 65536 rows and 256 columns. Try to use your keyboard to navigate to those cell. We design our scrolling to let use focus on the area with data. So, you may not be able to use the scroll to go to area with no data initially.</p>
<p>By your comparison, we discovered a silly mistake when we are packing the javascript. We&#8217;ve packed a new one and now it size is just ~120K, so, it should loads about 5 times faster now. Sorry for your inconvenience.</p>
<p><b>Joe: sorry, it should have been 2<sup>16</sup> rows, and not 216 rows, fixed now</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 169/169 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.compactbyte.com @ 2012-02-09 07:58:49 -->
